Moral testimony Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Moral witness - Article ExampleMoral experts have no gather up to seek out former(a)s clean-living expertise, but honorable non-experts lack sufficient friendship to determine whether the advice provided by a putative moral expert in response to complex moral situations is correct and indeed whether an individual is a bone fide expert.1The acceptance of moral testimony has been challenged on the fanny that it does non make knowledge available to the recipient and therefore the use of such a knowledge is illegitimate.Before the moderatenesss for this objection are discussed it is worth noting that little academic attention has actually been paid to the idea of whether or not testimony can be a legitimate source of moral beliefs.2we should be open to organism persuaded by others, responsive to moral argument but we should not take their word on moral issues, not allow ourselves to be influenced by the fact that they hold a certain view.if, on the other hand, reliance on moral testimony is legitimate, there will still be questions about the conditions under which it is so. 3This means that even though it is hard for us as humans to avert or accept moral judgements and considerations subconsciously , we cannot let these considerations to become a part of our analyses in true(a) life. For example my idea that a certain person is racist or a liar is base on my own perceptions and experiences. When dealing with this person my prejudices will inevitably suffice (even though in a very subtle manner).However any action by a third party based on my views or moral testimony should not be relied upon. Even if my moral testimony does form the basis of another partys reaction or action and it is subsequently accepted Hopkins(2007) believes that there should be a much solid reason for doing so rather than my own value judgements.It has been further suggested that moral discourse, for some reason or other, cannot meet the conditions requisite for learning from t he word of others. Since the epistemology is wrong, there is no knowledge to be had from passport transactions on moral matters.(Hopkins 2007). It is for this reason that it is believed that it would be rather illegitimate to let others claims guide ones moral belief. For example as an employer of a person I might be faced with the moral testimony of the hiring committee that this person has moral mars but I cannot base my judgement on these moral shortcomings. first off because morality is largely a matter of perception and the evidence offered in this regard will as well as be based on feelings or the personal experiences of the moral expert, and not actual evidence of their shortcoming like theft or irresponsibility on the job. Of course the contrary view in this regards is that in the right circumstances, moral dialogue may meet and fulfil all the criteria of testimonies in general (Hopkins 2007). The riddle however remains that moral testimony lies in a standard that only relates to morals and since knowledge is right, testimony does make moral knowledge available. (Hopkins 2007)For a more profound analysis of this issue it is necessary to delve deeper into what the words moral and testimony entail in